Ghayal Once Again Box Office Collection
Why practise some movies fail and others brand millions? The reasons vary from film to pic, but one thing is sure. It doesn't thing if a picture has an enormous upkeep, practiced marketing and the hottest actors in Hollywood. The audience decides if a pic is worth the price of admission.
When a moving picture flops at the box part, it creates a financial ripple outcome that is felt from the distributor to the producer. Hollywood has produced more duds than hits over the years. Permit's take a look at the biggest box part bombs in the history of the business organisation.
The Wolfman (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$80,000,000
The audiences in 2010 had werewolf fever. Unfortunately, this more traditional story of an American man getting attacked by a werewolf and transforming into one didn't win over audiences like the Twilight series.
The movie had a stellar bandage of A-listers, including Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt and Anthony Hopkins, simply even they couldn't save it from box office blunder. Information technology didn't brand back the $150 million upkeep and was greeted with mixed reviews. On the brilliant side, it eventually turned into a cult classic, making it a little more successful than virtually of the other movies on our list.
Windtalkers (2002) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$81,000,000
Every year, studios release a movie hoping to win big at the Oscars. Windtalkers tells the story of two U.S. Marines sent to protect Navajo Marines who used their unwritten native language to communicate safely on military radios. Information technology's based on an incredible true story, and information technology should take qualified as an American film classic.
The picture received negative criticism for its clichéd war scenes and its lack of focus on the Native American actors in comparison to the screen time given to star Nicolas Muzzle. In the end, this motion-picture show didn't get the accolades the creators expected.
Tomorrowland (2015) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$150,000,000
This ambitious sci-fi flick stars George Clooney as a former boy-wonder who has always had a passion for science and invention. Equally an adult, he teams up with a like-minded, curious young daughter, played by Britt Robertson. They piece of work together to explore the mysteries of time and space. Eventually, the squad ends up somewhere they thought just existed in their minds.
It sounds intriguing, but audiences and critics weren't interested, and information technology didn't meet box office expectations. In fact, information technology only received a fifty% approval score on Rotten Tomatoes, not because it was tedious, but considering it had too much going on.
Power Rangers (2017) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000
The latest installment in the pop Ability Rangers franchise was supposed to be one of the biggest movies of 2017. It was a revival of every '90's child's favorite show, and information technology featured autistic and LGBTQ actors, a beginning for a superhero picture.
Sadly, the picture's progressive casting and special furnishings didn't turn this movie into the blockbuster the creators anticipated. Critics cited tonal inconsistencies, and audiences obviously merely weren't interested in a modernized adaptation of the story. In the end, Power Rangers ended upwards being one of the biggest flops of the entire yr.
How Do You lot Know (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$105,000,000
Everyone loves a good sometime-fashioned rom-com, right? That was the thought backside How Do You Know? The movie stars America's sweetheart Reese Witherspoon, who plays a woman who only got cutting from the U.S.A. women'southward softball team.
As if that's not plenty, she gets defenseless in a dear triangle with her current pro ball boyfriend (Owen Wilson) and a corporate practise-gooder played by the affable Paul Rudd. The connection between her career and love troubles is weak, and many critics said the movie lacked a functional plot. In the end, no one wanted to run across this confusing, go-nowhere movie.
Sahara (2005) – Estimated Loss: $78,000,000–$100,000,000
Movie adaptations of books frequently turn into instant classics or become some of the biggest bombs in the film manufacture — Sahara fits into the latter category. The movie didn't do a great job of telling the story in Clive Cussler'due south bestselling novel, and motion-picture show-goers didn't like it.
This one-act-action movie didn't do well with viewers, who found the chemistry between Matthew McConaughey and Penelope Cruz to exist non-existent. The overall script lacked originality, and the movie didn't fare well with critics either. Even though it was visually appealing, the dazzler of the Sahara desert couldn't rescue this failure of a movie.
Gods of Egypt (2016) – Estimated Loss: $79,000,000–$xc,000,000
When will Hollywood realize they can't produce Egyptian-themed movies with primarily white casts anymore? You would think they would know past now that audiences don't similar it, and Gods of Egypt was no exception. If anything, this movie taught anybody a long overdue lesson on the importance of accurate representation.
The moving-picture show received tons of backlash over the casting — plenty for Lionsgate and director Alex Proyas to event an apology for the casting gaffe. That wasn't the merely problem critics found with the flick, however. They also ripped it to shreds for its lackluster interim, boring script and overuse of special effects.
The Man from U.Northward.C.L.East. (2015) – Estimated Loss: $lxxx,000,000
Directed past fan favorite Guy Ritchie, this movie was based on the popular 1960's Boob tube testify. The rights to the testify were purchased all the way back in 1994, but numerous rewrites delayed the film'due south production, and it wasn't released until 2015.
All that time spent trying to get the script just correct didn't pay off, unfortunately. Based on the pic'due south weak box role functioning, it may accept fifty-fifty done more harm than good. Fifty-fifty with actors who were at the meridian of their game, like Henry Cavill, The Homo from U.N.C.L.E. received mixed reviews from critics and failed to attract an audience.
Fantastic Four (2015) – Estimated Loss: $80,000,000–$100,000,000
In the last 20 years, the world has enjoyed a flood of superhero movies, and the genre has turned into a highly profitable Hollywood article. Fifty-fifty remakes of memorable favorites take fared well — until the Fantastic Four. The latest adaptation of Marvel'south start family did non win over fans.
This reimagined version of the famous comic actually angered many longtime fans because of its wildly different storyline. Other than the acting, which received mixed reviews, critics and viewers weren't impressed and called the movie cheesy, uninteresting and predictable. To add insult to injury, the movie only has a meager ix% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Ouch!
Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – Estimated Loss: $eighty,000,000
In some cases, even movies with skilful reviews can flop. This follow-upwardly to the original 'fourscore's Bract Runner is a skilful instance of that. Blade Runner 2049 had a stellar cast, including Harrison Ford and Ryan Gosling, impressive fine art management and Oscar-winning photography. Information technology was well-received past critics and fans and accomplished an 87% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
None of these things seemed to help the film'south operation at the box office. It underperformed and ended upwards costing the studio millions of dollars. Many people speculate that the lengthy run-fourth dimension of 163 minutes was probably more time than most people wanted to spend in a theater.
Supernova (2000) – Estimated Loss: $83,000,000
Is there a term for a film that underperforms so spectacularly that "flop" doesn't even exercise it justice? If and so, then Supernova definitely falls into that category. The picture show had a $ninety million production upkeep but only grossed $xiv.eight one thousand thousand, making it one of the biggest losses in Hollywood history.
This moving-picture show non only failed to fill moving-picture show seats, but it too got scathing reviews. To date, it simply has a score of 19% on Rotten Tomatoes. Sci-fi fans everywhere consider it to exist a joke because of its lack of excitement, disruptive storyline and mediocre special furnishings.
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets (2017) – Estimated Loss: $84,000,000
Valerian and the Urban center of a Thousand Planets seemed to have a lot going for information technology prior to its debut. The movie had an A-listing bandage with British stars Clive Owen and Cara Delevingne, nifty marketing and a high product budget, but all of these things ended up working against it.
The toll of advertising and production actually cost so much that information technology didn't turn much of a turn a profit, fifty-fifty with decent attendance numbers. Even though information technology wasn't the worst movie ever made, the reviews were mixed, which didn't help its cause. The movie only has a 43% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Town & Country (2001) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Town & Land has earned a reputation every bit one of the worst movies always fabricated. The Hollywood Reporter even went so far as to list it as the fifth-biggest flop of the 2000s. The movie had a star-studded ensemble cast that included Warren Beatty, Diane Keaton, Gary Shandling and Goldie Hawn, only that wasn't enough to win over audiences.
Critics and movie-goers alike establish the plot to be confusing, the characters unlikeable and the editing to be confusingly bad. In the end, it only grossed $10.4 million and has a measly 13% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes, making it a low betoken in the careers of everyone involved.
Treasure Planet (2002) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
This animated take on the archetype Robert Louis Stevenson novel Treasure Island proves that sometimes it's best to leave a fourth dimension-honored story alone. Even though it was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Blithe Feature, it wasn't well-received by nigh critics, and audiences didn't requite it the fourth dimension of day, either.
Anybody agreed that the animation was stunning and visually impressive, but the story was considered weak. 1 tough critic, A.O. Scott, even called it a "dotterel, mechanical film." On the other manus, for those who did come across it, the motion picture currently has a 69% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
7th Son (2014) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Critics didn't seem to care for this fantasy pic that was based on the famous novel The Spook'southward Amateur. Many blamed the lack of imagination and an overload of special effects for making it ane of the nigh boring flops of 2014. Information technology's one you lot might not even remember hearing about, as it almost seemed to disappear overnight.
The simply saving grace of the picture show was its stars, including Jeff Bridges and Julianne Moore, but even they couldn't do much to help. The movie ended upward losing tens of millions of dollars and has since been forgotten along with the rest of Hollywood'south bombs.
Pan (2015) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$150,000,000
Peter Pan is one of the virtually famous, beloved children's stories in the world, but that didn't make people want to see the 2015 live action film Pan. The latest in nearly a dozen moving-picture show adaptations of the classic story, the film was criticized for its reliance on CGI and its unimaginative storytelling.
Also the weak script and the overuse of special effects, an exuberant corporeality of money was spent on marketing for the motion picture. In addition to the already huge budget of $150 million, $100-$125 1000000 was spent on advertising alone, putting the movie in a fiscal hole.
A Wrinkle in Time (2018) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$186,000,000
When information technology comes to movie making, ambition is a adept affair, but sometimes movies are also ambitious for their own good. A Wrinkle in Time is a perfect example of that. The long-awaited picture show adaptation of the famous book failed to win audiences over and added to the already long list of failed books-turned-movies.
Critics felt it was a visual masterpiece but also thought creators flake off more than they could chew. Even strong performances from famous faces like Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pine likewise as newcomer Storm Reid couldn't create the same captivating magic the book had.
Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$106,000,000
This fantastical, modernistic take on a childhood archetype isn't the biggest bomb on the list, but information technology didn't turn out to be a moneymaker for the studio. This CGI-heavy movie directed by Bryan Singer got a mixed bag when it came to its reception, with audiences and critics disagreeing on its merits.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film scored a measly 53% with a lot of viewers calling it tedious, unnecessary and predictable. Some critics, even so, felt the movie was action-packed and entertaining. Hollywood Reporter critic Todd McCarthy even said the moving picture was improve than The Hobbit.
Jupiter Ascending (2015) – Estimated Loss: $87,000,000–$120,000,000
Unfortunately, the merely thing people seemed to like about Jupiter Ascending was the beautiful special effects, and that wasn't enough to save information technology from losing large time at the box office. At the time, people were already inundated with space movies, and this movie didn't have a strong enough story to compete.
The Wachowski-directed space fantasy only grossed $47 one thousand thousand in the U.S. and got negative reviews from critics. Despite fairly original and novel earth-building, some professionals reviewing the film said the script was "breathless." Audiences didn't seem impressed either, and the movie currently has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Ascent of the Guardians (2012) – Estimated Loss: $93,000,000
This ane is some other disappointing example of a picture show adaptation gone wrong. Rise of the Guardians, released in 2012, is an animated adaptation of the popular children's volume The Guardians of Childhood. Sadly, having a well-told story already laid out doesn't guarantee movie success.
Rise of the Guardians failed to exercise the original story justice and concluded upwards wasting a ton of money on marketing. This combination didn't pay off in the long-run, and the studio lost around $93 million. At to the lowest degree kids seemed to like it, and many reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes gave information technology a positive review for this reason.
Evan Omnipotent (2007) – Estimated Loss: $88,000,000
This follow-upwardly to Bruce Omnipotent didn't exactly match its predecessor'south success — nowhere near it, actually. The motion-picture show is often regarded equally one of the worst sequels of all time. Critics complained that, unlike the outset movie, Evan Almighty was a picture that had besides many special effects and offered besides few laughs.
Fans of the original were put off past the almost preachy tone of the sequel, and it only received a 23% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Jim Carrey has a reputation for bailing on sequels to his movies. In this case, it looks similar he made a wise choice.
Cutthroat Island (1995) – Estimated Loss: $89,000,000
Cutthroat Island didn't win big at the box office, only it did win the Guinness World Record championship for Globe's Largest Box Office Flop. Fortunately, Guinness did away with that record, but it doesn't change the fact that this was i of the biggest bombs in Hollywood. Information technology stood unchallenged for years as the biggest blackness marking on the box office.
The endless problems on set and with product were the main causes for this movie's failure. In fact, the movie did so poorly that pirate movies were essentially forbidden in Hollywood for years until the success of Pirates of the Caribbean inverse all that.
R.I.P.D. (2013) – Estimated Loss: $91,000,000–$115,000,000
Who would have idea you lot could go incorrect with an activity-one-act starring everyone'due south favorite heartthrob Ryan Reynolds and the iconic Jeff Bridges? Well, apparently, R.I.P.D. is proof yous tin can. Despite the box office appeal of Reynolds, this movie couldn't manage to fill theaters.
It'due south based on the pop comic book only but doesn't compare to the actual comic, and fans were left disappointed. The concept didn't seem to resonate with audiences, who found the movie to exist goofy and downright awful. That would explain the 13% Rotten Tomatoes blessing rating.
The Hope (2016) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000–$102,000,000
The Promise tells the story of a beloved triangle between a brilliant medical educatee, a beautiful young woman and her current beau, all set up in the historic days of the Ottoman Empire. The creators might take been hoping for an Oscar nomination or even a win, simply it didn't happen with this anticlimactic film.
The story wasn't terrible, merely information technology wasn't impressive, which may be the reason behind the film'due south dismal functioning with audiences and critics. Christian Bale and Oscar Isaac are known for their incredible acting skills, but even their talent couldn't get people to watch this movie.
The Alamo (2004) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
In Hollywood, remakes tin can exist pretty risky when producers are up against the success and expectations established by the original. The 2004 version of The Alamo is 1 example of a failed remake. This picture show had a lot of things working against its potential for success.
For one, it was filmed on 1 of the largest sets in Northward America, which added to its already staggering budget. The previews weren't well received, which delayed the release. One time information technology was released, it had to compete with The Passion of the Christ. Basically, this film didn't stand a chance.
Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
The popular Final Fantasy series has proven to be ane of the almost successful, longest-running video game franchises in history, but all that market goodwill didn't show helpful when Terminal Fantasy: The Spirits Within was released in theaters. The movie was ambitious and visually impressive, merely that was nigh it.
The studio hoped the mind-blowing animation and big-name actors like Alec Baldwin providing voice talent would be enough to make more the $137 million budget, but they didn't. The detailed graphics had never been seen earlier, just audiences and critics all the same found the characters to be strong and unrealistic.
The Lone Ranger (2013) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000–$190,000,000
Later on the international success of the Pirates of the Caribbean area franchise, Disney thought they could use Johnny Depp'southward star power to bring in some more big bucks. Unfortunately, they chose the wrong projection because The Alone Ranger was a huge flop.
The movie's massive production and marketing budgets failed to draw audiences in to picket the movie. Despite nearly single-handedly reviving the swashbuckling genre, Depp failed to do the same with the ballsy western. It probably didn't help that many people who watched information technology were more than a trivial irked to run into a white guy playing a Native American character, but the weak story gets almost of the blame.
The Mummy (2017) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000
Later on the massive success of the Brendan Fraser trilogy, producers likely saw more box office gold to be mined from the Mummy franchise. Simply did this serial really need another reboot? After watching this 2017 version, the respond is "no." Fifty-fifty Tom Prowl couldn't save this disaster of a picture, and information technology ended upward getting pulled from 800 theaters after three weeks.
What was the cause of the laughable turnout? Borderline Hollywood blamed it on "blockbuster fatigue," maxim that audiences were burned out on activity-packed movies with tons of CGI. It was intended to launch a Dark Universe franchise for Universal, but those plans were scrapped.
The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002) – Estimated Loss: $96,000,000
Building on an already legendary career in standup comedy, Eddie Murphy became one of the biggest comedic picture stars in the '80s and '90s. All of that came to a screeching halt with the release of 2002's forgettable The Adventures of Pluto Nash.
Murphy played an interstellar nightclub owner who is trying to go along his business out of the easily of infinite-age gangsters. As much as people love infinite movies, audiences and critics weren't feeling this ridiculous plot, and information technology showed in the dismal box office performance. The film just brought in a puny $7 million, a tiny fraction of its $100 one thousand thousand budget.
Mars Needs Moms (2011) – Estimated Loss: $100,000,000–$144,000,000
Mars Needs Moms might exist one of Disney'south biggest blunders. It had a classic trouble with overspending, which explains the $150 1000000 dollar budget. In addition to the enormous production budget, the studio spent $25 meg on advertising. This made it nearly impossible for Pixar to turn a profit, which they didn't.
Expenses weren't the only problem, however. No ane seemed to similar the moving picture, mostly due to its creepy hyper-realistic animation. It got terrible reviews and currently has a 37% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. If you missed this one when it came out, the only value is for a cringe-watch.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/biggest-box-office-bombs-hollywood-history?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Ghayal Once Again Box Office Collection"
Post a Comment